Psychology, Philosophy & Politics

Psychology says: In order to feel worthy of something we need to be whole

Philosophy asks: Am I whole because I’m worthy or is worthiness a state of active thinking that strings together one full whole?

Politics responds: In as long as your basic, fundamental needs have been met, you can choose what wholeness and worthiness looks like to you

Psychology says: Vulnerability is the cornerstone of all human connections

Philosophy asks: For isn’t it the mind that conceptualizes the emotion to create the connection? How can you feel what you can’t conceptualize?

Politics responds: For as long as our actions remain indiscriminate and fair, all societies can and will, integrate and connect peacefully with one another

Psychology says: You attract what you are therefore you need to be what you want

Philosophy asks: If I am my attractions, do I control everything that happens to me?

Politics responds: Every individual shall and should be skilled to contribute to the growth of the economy: you are an echo of the country’s growth

Psychology says: Stop seeking for validation outside of yourself

Philosophy asks: What is a self?

Politics responds: We need to scrutinize our societies compared to our neighboring countries so that we set standards for ourselves in order for the rest of the world to validate our importance in the global economy

Psychology says: It’s in the hands of God

Philosophy asks: What is a God?

Politics responds: It’s in the hands of the voters

Psychology says: Happiness is an active process of living wholeheartedly

Philosophy asks: If I achieve happiness, what would be the point of rest of my life?

Politics responds: Every citizen shall have the right to happiness, freedom and liberty for as long as they do not infringe upon the happiness, freedom and liberty of their fellow countrymen and countrywomen.

What do you want to say?

What do you want to ask?

How would you like to respond?

4 thoughts on “Psychology, Philosophy & Politics

Add yours

    1. Hi Simeon, thank you for reading this and for your comments! Would you like to explain your confusion? I’m curious to know?

      Thanks once again for reading.

      Like

      1. The lines can get really blurry between the two. It’s no wonder psychologists are also philosophers, so maybe you are a philosopher. Or what makes you so sure that you’re not?

        Like

Leave a comment

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑